Edwards has refused to participate in a debate co-sponsored by the FoxNews channel and the Colorado Democrat Party.   His campaign is accusing Fox of having a conservative bias.  I am constantly impressed at the low level of intelligence that the liberals believe Americans possess.  I'm Insulted!!

In reality all he  and his campaign have done is to very clearly illustrate what the majority of America knew all along.  The main stream media has a definite liberal bias and anything that departs from that normative state is now considered "pro-conservative", even if it falls very very far short of actually being even remotely related to being truly conservative.

Since he does not fill "safe" participating in a "biased" debate setting (now remember just the Dems and Fox are involved, as far as I know Coulter has absolutely no association with the debate), he only illustrates what a mental coward he is.

If his position on the issues is worth believing in, worth standing up for and worth you giving your priceless vote to him for, then wouldn't it be worth publicly defending in ANY forum?

Apparently not, so we are left with one of two conclusions regarding Edwards and one conclusion about the MSM.

First Edwards.  He is either a mental coward (my belief) or an insincere candidate who does not believe in the positions he espouses publicly.  He only states them so that people will vote for him.  I am going with mental coward, since Hillary already has the "I'll say (promise) whatever you want me say (promise) as long as you vote for me" category pretty well monopolized.  So he is the King of the Sound-bite!!  The great defender of the 20-second quip of the day!  He gallantly parades before his followers, while no enemies are sight before retreating back to the well defended walls of his 28,000 square foot castle . . .

Secondly, the MSM, they obviously are biased.  My proof?  besides the very very obvious?  Just more obviousness, because the liberal's mental cowards (Edwards) flock to them as do the "hollow" candidates (Clinton) and their willingly-deluded followers. . . .